Against Abortion Essays Arguments

So the Virginia governor who, in addition to being an egregious racist, is also a pediatric neurologist.So he’s asked about this and he basically says that he, I think, is - and this seems to me the most logical explanation for what he’s talking about - he’s basically saying in a situation in which the pregnancy is failing, in a situation in which you have this fetus that you know is not going to survive and you’re on the delivery table.Where what is at stake is the question of whether a fetus is human and what kind of rights it has.

So the Virginia governor who, in addition to being an egregious racist, is also a pediatric neurologist.So he’s asked about this and he basically says that he, I think, is - and this seems to me the most logical explanation for what he’s talking about - he’s basically saying in a situation in which the pregnancy is failing, in a situation in which you have this fetus that you know is not going to survive and you’re on the delivery table.Where what is at stake is the question of whether a fetus is human and what kind of rights it has.

Tags: Expository Essay MeaningChemistry In Medicines EssayEssay On NatureThesis In SwedenEssay On Environmental DeterminismIntro To Psychology Short Essay QuestionsMaster Research PaperThesis On CoumarinsSolve C Programming Problems OnlineDistance Learning Creative Writing

I think there probably are cases that are going to be allowed under this law that I would probably consider morally abhorrent.

But to me the greater danger and what the reform is trying to do — and let’s be clear, this reform isn’t happening, right?

There are very, very few abortions in the United States that take place at 36 or 37 weeks. There are various estimates but —That would be 22 to 26 or 27 weeks, right?

And so the reason these bills then become a flashpoint is both about the possibility of infants being killed outside of the mother’s womb, which is rare but real, and also the fact that there’s just a larger argument here, right?

Ross I know you think of this bill very differently, both in terms of what it would do but also in terms of how important it is because, as you’ve pointed out, in New York State for example they actually have passed a version of this law. So I guess it’s useful to think of this in terms of, sort of, two sets of cases that the anti-abortion side, my side of the argument, is thinking about when we argue about this bill and when we talk about a viral video clip like this one. So the first is a set of cases that do relate specifically to what happens to infants - former fetuses turned babies - that are either born alive in the course of a late-term abortion or in some potential world are born alive with a terrible medical condition, a serious disability and so on.

And that’s a very, very small number of cases especially in the first case but they do, in fact, exist, right?

You know she should have said like, “Hypothetically yes but that will never happen.” Instead she just said yes, that would be allowed. “Pro-choice radicals want abortion on the delivery table!

” And then Ralph Northam is on the radio and—Right, the Virginia governor.

The sort of, in the situation, in the hypothetical that this Republican lawmaker has presented, here’s what would actually happen: the woman would deliver the baby.

It would be resuscitated and then the parents would make a decision.