These papers compound the weaknesses of essays in the 3-5 range.Moreover, they seriously misread the passage or fail to respond adequately to the question.All essays, both in-class and take-home, will be evaluated with the standard AP rubrics for poetry, prose and open-ended questions.
These papers compound the weaknesses of essays in the 3-5 range.Moreover, they seriously misread the passage or fail to respond adequately to the question.All essays, both in-class and take-home, will be evaluated with the standard AP rubrics for poetry, prose and open-ended questions.Tags: Argumentative Essay On Not Lowering The Drinking AgeHow To Write A Definition Essay ExamplesEssay Relationship Between Mother DaughterHuman Rights Dissertation TopicsGettysburg Address EssayEssay On My Pet SquirrelResearch Papers Communication BusinessPoetry HomeworkComputer Dissertation IndexCover Letter For Crna School
However, sometimes materials are not directly related to an AP prompt.
Below are samples of generic rubrics containing the general language and areas of concentration used to evaluate AP essays for prose analysis, poetry analysis, and open-ended questions. I have tried to equate a percentage grade with each of the number scores.
In their textual references they are apt and specific.
Although the writers may provide a range of interpretations, these papers will offer a convincing interpretation of the poem as well as consistent control over the elements of effective composition, including the language unique to the criticism of verse.
These papers looks good on the surface but are simplistic.
Students respond correctly but do not devote enough space to arguments.Two papers will paraphrase from the selection while the one essays omit any reference to the text.These well-organized and well-written essays clearly demonstrate an understanding of how the poet expresses the complex attitude of the speaker.These papers attempt to explain the passage but do so inaccurately or ineffectively.They may present misguided or underdeveloped analysis of point of view, syntax, diction, detail, organization and/or fail to relate them to the thesis.These papers adequately demonstrate an understanding of the passage.Tone identification may not be as precise or thesis as forcefully worded as in 9-8 essays.These papers are not as thorough, precise, or aware of complexities as the top scoring papers.They may deal with fewer narrative techniques, and analysis may be less perceptive or less developed than that of the better essays.The essays may be unacceptably brief, may be poorly written on several counts and/or may contain many distracting errors in grammar and mechanics.Although they may have attempted to answer the question, the views presented typically have little clarity or coherence.