Most people find it easier once they get onto the mathematics itself.You should try in the introduction to cover the following checklist. Don't be ashamed or too proud to admit and reference the previous work ('the shoulders of giants') which inspired and led up to your result.
Most people find it easier once they get onto the mathematics itself.You should try in the introduction to cover the following checklist. Don't be ashamed or too proud to admit and reference the previous work ('the shoulders of giants') which inspired and led up to your result.Remember, however, that you are not writing a thesis here: your goal is not to redo the work of persons A, B, C (which you may well have done in your notes while reading them, but that's tough).Tags: Essay Writing Summer CoursesCompare Contrast Essay Graphic OrganizerArgumentative Essay About CohabitationCoffee Cafe Business PlanDiderot Essays PaintingEssay Diagram
This should recall to the reader why the kind of result mentioned already in the abstract would be interesting and important. A good way is to tell a story, an interesting one that puts everything into perspective re the existing literature and conveys how it is you succeeded where others failed. It should not reflect the actual historical progress of your research (which may have been long and winding) but rather based on how your thinking should have gone with the benefit of hindsight.
It also tells the reader what you think is the motivation, so that if he or she agrees with the way you are looking at the field, there's some probability that the paper will be useful for them. This is not quite the same as the shortest logical path (which would not be understood until after the paper is read), but rather involves an historical element with reference to works and ideas that the reader might already be familiar with.
This should instantly convey why your work stands out from all previous ones.
Should be intelligible to non-experts and down-to-earth though perhaps slightly enigmatic or 'catchy'.
Who did really introduce the idea X that you are using and are giving him or her proper credit?
This can also be woven into the above by way of making it interesting. State the goal and main achievement of each section.Note that it's rare for a young person to do something totally out of the blue, and worrisome for a referee.Make contacts with other aspects of the literature.This goes along with finding a Math Reviews code, which can be included in a foot note if you know it.Many readers and (sad to say) quite possibly the referee will not get past the introduction.Also, keep in mind some role models people you know or famous papers.The general aim is to be attractive to non-experts as much as can be expected, while interesting and not offensive to experts.The significance of a paper tends to be in inverse proportion to the length of the abstract.The shorter the abstract, usually the more powerful the results.It is assumed of course that you have some results worth presenting (as no amount of good writing can cover up a lack of content).How you write depends on the journal/type of reader you are addressing.