It is important to show the relations Statements that begin like "Descartes also said …" usually indicate that the author does not know how to relate Descartess various views to each other.
She or he is simply listing all of Descartes’s beliefs, one after the other. Sentence beginnings that are likely to be in a good Philosophy paper are the following: None of these Danger Signs is bad in itself.
" This question has nothing to do with the previous paragraph.
The author is offering the promise of an article that will help you buy a new car, then following it with a rhetorical question that sets the audience up for a letdown.
These are mostly features that I’ve found in student papers that usually lead to trouble. The conclusion (for example) of Descartes’s argument for skepticism is not “Do we really know anything?
They are not cut-and-dried mistakes, but they seem to be associated with confused reasoning and/or passages that are difficult for your poor professor to understand. One reason that rhetorical questions are dangerous is that you (as the writer) know what the answer is to the question. So tell me what you think – don’t ask me a question which (you think) has an obvious answer. As you can see in #1 above, arguments are the important things. ” I don’t know how this started, but it is a growing trend in papers. Events or times are properly described by "is when," for example "Noon is when we eat lunch." Philosophical doctrines should be described by statements.This is an effective use of the rhetorical question. A rhetorical question isn't meant to be answered by the audience, but it should be answered by the writer who states it.While rhetorical questions aren't meant to be answered, they are used to engage the audience's attention.Another strategy is to change actually questions into rhetorical questions.Some examples: Rhetorical questions tend to use high modality language when questions often use low modality language.Here is an example: "Skepticism is when you don’t really know anything." This is a bad definition of skepticism. They should not be reported as questions (see Danger Sign 1) or events (like "is when.") There’s nothing grammatically wrong with "also said …" (like there is for a theory described as "is when …" or as a question).However, when I see the above phrase in an exam or paper, I am warned that the student is not really following Hint #1) above.They are questions that do not expect an answer but trigger an internal response for the reader such as an empathy with questions like 'How would you feel?' or more obviously 'You would feel bad, wouldn’t you?Once you have that attention, you should follow it up with relevant material that not only answers the rhetorical question, directly or indirectly, but which expands on it.The rhetorical question is often the introduction to a larger topic. It is a strong, effective device if used sparingly.