This OWL resource addresses the steps in writing for a variety of academic proposals.For samples of conference proposals, article abstracts and proposals, and book proposals, click here.
This OWL resource addresses the steps in writing for a variety of academic proposals.For samples of conference proposals, article abstracts and proposals, and book proposals, click here.Tags: Social Problems EssayThesis Computer Science AbstractEditing A Thesis StatementTransition In EssayEmerson Nature Essay Summary1500 Word Essay On The Importance Of Being On TimePulp And Paper TermsSolving Exponent Problems
Structure and components A conference proposal will typically consist of an introduction to your topic, which should not amount to more than one-third of the length of your submission, followed by your thesis statement and a delineation of your approach to the problem. Important considerations for the writing process First and foremost, you need to consider your future audience carefully in order to determine both how specific your topic can be and how much background information you need to provide in your proposal.
You should then explain why your thesis is original and innovative as well as important and interesting to scholars who might be outside your specific area of research. Larger conferences, such as regional MLA meetings or the ALA (American Literature Association) will require you to direct your remarks to an audience that might not conduct research on the same time period or literary field at all.
You will be one of three to four participants in a panel or session (the terminology varies depending on the organizers) and be given fifteen to twenty minutes to present your paper.
This is often followed by a ten-minute question-and-answer session either immediately after your presentation or after all of the speakers are finished.
Accordingly, you will receive some rejections to your submissions in the course of your career, which, in contrast to book proposals or fellowship applications, do not come with an explanation for the rejection.
There are common pitfalls that you might need to improve on for future proposals.
It is up to the panel organizer to decide upon this framework.
In the course of the question-and-answer session, you may also address and query the other panelists if you have questions yourself.
The proposal does not reflect your enthusiasm and persuasiveness, which usually goes hand in hand with hastily written, simply worded proposals.
Generally, the better your research has been, the more familiar you are with the subject and the more smoothly your proposal will come together.